🫀 23.03% developed dysphagia after cardiac surgery
🫀 23.03% developed dysphagia after cardiac surgery
In a prospective cohort of 573 cardiac surgery patients at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Sept 2024–July 2025), 23.03% developed postoperative dysphagia. A gradient boosting machine (GBM) model best predicted risk (test AUC 0.851; 95% CI 0.781–0.908), with top drivers including age, Diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic lung disease, CKD, AF, and airway/tube and sedation durations.
Why It Matters To Your Practice
Dysphagia after cardiac surgery is common and clinically consequential (aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, longer LOS), but risk is often recognized late.
Machine learning-based stratification could help target early swallow screening and prevention resources to the patients most likely to benefit.
Clinical Implications
Consider pre-op and early post-op workflows that flag higher-risk patients (older age, DM, chronic lung disease, CKD, AF) for earlier bedside swallow evaluation and diet precautions.
Modifiable perioperative signals in the model (tracheal intubation time, gastric intubation time, sedative drug use duration) point to potential levers for prevention and quality improvement.
For implementation, pair model output with clear action pathways (e.g., automatic speech-language pathology consult thresholds; aspiration precautions; nutrition escalation).
Insights
Among eight approaches (LR, AdaBoost, CatBoost, XGBoost, SVM, NB, KNN, GBM), GBM performed best on discrimination and was supported by calibration and decision-curve analysis.
Use of SHAP improves interpretability by showing how individual features contribute to a given patient’s predicted risk—key for clinician trust and auditability.
Risk appears to be a mix of baseline vulnerability (age/comorbidity) and care-course exposures (airway/tube time and sedation duration), reinforcing that prevention may be partly operational.
The Bottom Line
About 1 in 4 cardiac surgery patients developed dysphagia in this prospective cohort.
A validated GBM model (AUC 0.851) could support earlier, individualized screening and prevention—especially for patients with DM and other high-risk features.