A review of automated knee imaging segmentation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) planning finds that deep learning can improve segmentation accuracy and downstream prediction, but its transferability is often limited by dependence on large annotated datasets and variability in MRI/CT protocols. The paper contrasts classical region/boundary/atlas/model-based methods with AI-driven approaches and highlights where current performance breaks in heterogeneous real-world imaging.
Why It Matters To Your Practice
▪ Knee osteoarthritis imaging workflows are increasingly data-heavy, and segmentation is a gating step for pre-op planning, templating, and outcome prediction in TKA.
▪ AI tools may look strong in development settings but can degrade when scanner type, sequence parameters, artifacts, or patient anatomy differ from the training data.
Clinical Implications
▪ Expect uneven performance across sites: models trained on narrow, highly curated annotated datasets may underperform on your institutions “messy” scans (motion, metal, variable protocols).
▪ When evaluating vendor tools, ask what imaging protocols and populations were used for training/validation, and whether external (multi-center) testing was done.
▪ Plan for workflow safeguards: human review/override remains essential when segmentation outputs feed implant sizing, alignment planning, or patient-specific instrumentation.
Insights
▪ Classical methods can be brittle but are often more interpretable; deep learning reduces manual feature engineering but shifts risk to dataset bias and annotation quality.
▪ Annotation is not just volumeits consistency: inter-rater variability, labeling conventions, and anatomy definitions can materially affect model behavior.
▪ Protocol variability (sequence choice, resolution, contrast) is a first-order driver of generalization gaps, not a minor edge case.
The Bottom Line
▪ AI knee segmentation is clinically promising for osteoarthritis/TKA workflows, but real-world reliability hinges less on model architecture and more on dataset breadth, annotation quality, and protocol diversity.
▪ Clinicians should treat segmentation AI as decision support with explicit validation in local imaging conditionsnot a plug-and-play automation layer.